![robotstudio how to rotate tool robotstudio how to rotate tool](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/drHktqjp4wQ/maxresdefault.jpg)
- #Robotstudio how to rotate tool manual#
- #Robotstudio how to rotate tool full#
- #Robotstudio how to rotate tool Offline#
Once all of the tool paths were generated, the program was loaded to a USB drive, and transferred to the robot.īefore any actual cutting of foam was to be done, the program was tested on the robot. Using this method, the surface of the fin was traced. AutoPath allows RobotStudio to detect an edge around a selected object, and generate a tool path along that edge. This feature allowed the use of the AutoPath tool. The slices in the solid model generated distinct edges along both sides of them. These slices were oriented across the fin, parallel to the root. To facilitate easier modeling of the robot operation, slices were added to the fin model prior to importing it into RobotStudio. With this set up, a SolidWorks model of the midscale fin was imported into the work station. To do this, a digital workstation was set up in RobotStudio, which included a model of the robot that would be used for actual manufacturing.
#Robotstudio how to rotate tool Offline#
As such, the offline programming method was pursued.
#Robotstudio how to rotate tool manual#
Due to the complex nature of the fin shape, manual operation was unlikely to be successful. The ABB Robotic Arm can be operated either in a manual mode, or run from a program generated using ABB’s RobotStudio software. This is where one of the larger obstacles was encountered. This robot is capable of using an endmill attachment to carve materials, like foam, from multiple angles. For a precise recreation based on the SolidWorks model, the plan was to use WPI’s ABB Robotic Arm. The next step was making a foam positive of the fin.
#Robotstudio how to rotate tool full#
Where the small scale channel mold was created with a 3-D printer, the full scale channel insert was constructed on a panel made of wood that was set on top to close the box. One change was the way the channels made. The first full scale attempt incorporated some changes and improvements from the small scale models. The downside was that each iteration added to the cumulative time commitment of labor not being applied directly to the final model.įigure 33: SolidWorks Model of Half Fin 8.1.1 Final Fin - First Attempt The advantage to using incremental scaling was the ability to test and make improvements while being more time and resource efficient. The full scale channel mold made the progression from a single set of channels to multiple independent sets. Similar to the small scale, silicone was poured into the positive and channel inserts were pressed into the wet silicone.
![robotstudio how to rotate tool robotstudio how to rotate tool](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/24918e_69cd176a62254fb2b7f635b5d2269790~mv2.jpg)
Each 18in mold was cast directly into a wooden box so that it did not have to be cut or moved. One set of two, mirror imaged molds was capable of creating both of the full fins. The full scale model used two foam positives, one of each half of a fin, to make plaster negative molds. Each iteration of the manufacturing process was further refined to improve the results and progress toward a functioning set of fins. With the manufacturing process established through the iterations of smaller prototypes, full scale fabrication was started.